Hi,
I am working on a Quantum plugin for Brocade switches.
I noticed that if multiple 'provider' lines are specified in quantum/plugins.ini
that quantum will use the last one and ignore the rest.
What are the plans to support networking equipment from multiple vendors within
openstack?
Seems to
list you described, and using a new API for drivers
instead.
Andy
From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:10 PM
To: Andy Bierman
Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Netstack] support for multiple plugins in Quantum
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11
Hi,
I read the API spec (again) and I have the same comment as last time.
There are no normative definitions for any output from Quantum.
IMO, a RelaxNG pattern is needed for every 'XML blob' that is defined
by example.
An application needs to know the XML or JSON structure to expect.
It needs t
Ports?
}
Andy
From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:36 AM
To: Andy Bierman
Cc: Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Netstack] API documentation ready for review
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Andy Bierman
mailto:bierm.
Hi,
I am not able to get lp:nova and lp:quantum to work together, even with the
FakePlugin.
(euca-run-instances fails. Using standard libvirt settings except
-libvirt_vif_type=bridge
instead of ethernet, but setting it to ethernet doesn't change the bug.)
It looks like a bug was just introduced
5 matches
Mail list logo