Re: [Netstack] error codes in quantum api

2012-01-09 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi all, Here's another "resurrecting" email thread, after exactly a month! Aaron had a very interesting observation concerning error codes raised from the Quantum API. We currently use several 4xx codes to describe Quantum-specific errors, such as "NetworkNotFound" or "PortNotFound"; we ensured

Re: [Netstack] cloudpipe stuff

2012-01-09 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Ideally I would choose the 2nd route as well. However, this kind of reminds me of the discussions we were having at the design summit over whether we should rely on a new service/extension of the Quantum API for achieving feature parity (e.g. The ‘L3 service’) or try to re-use as much as possibl

Re: [Netstack] Specification for filters in quantum api

2012-01-09 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, First of all, apologies for a much-delayed reply. I'm officially back in office today, and I'm slowly catching up with my todo list. Please see my replies inline. The next time in my todo list is to push a preview of the code (I still need to add unit tests to make it gerrit-pushable). Sal

Re: [Netstack] Specification for filters in quantum api

2012-01-09 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I pushed some code for the api-filters feature into a github repo. You can find the code in the bp/api-filters here: git://github.com/salv-orlando/MyRepo.git Please note this code is not final yet (unit tests will come, pep8 and pylint will be improved). I'm sharing this to give you a feel of th