Hi,
I submitted the first patch which allows Ryu plugin to support v2 API.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9756/
Thanks,
Kaneko
2012/7/13 Isaku Yamahata :
> Our internal review/test of the first patch is done now.
> Kaneko of our team will mainly take care of it, so I changed
> its assignee to
Our internal review/test of the first patch is done now.
Kaneko of our team will mainly take care of it, so I changed
its assignee to him. Off course, I'm following him.
thanks,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 10:19:10AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> I registered
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quant
I registered
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/update-ryu-plugin-for-v2
thanks,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi Yamahata,
>
> Can you please create a BP for this work here? https://launchpad.net/quantum/
> +milestone/folsom-3
>
> Thanks,
>
> Da
Hi Yamahata,
Can you please create a BP for this work here?
https://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/folsom-3
Thanks,
Dan
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:13:31PM +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Can we please make a point to discuss this
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:13:31PM +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Can we please make a point to discuss this at tomorrow's meeting. I am
> in favor of Dan's proposal. I think that we just need to come to a
> consensus. There are a lot of comments regarding V1 and V2 on the
> following patc
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Can we please make a point to discuss this at tomorrow's meeting. I am in
> favor of Dan's proposal. I think that we just need to come to a consensus.
> There are a lot of comments regarding V1 and V2 on the following patches:
> -
>
Hi,
Can we please make a point to discuss this at tomorrow's meeting. I am
in favor of Dan's proposal. I think that we just need to come to a
consensus. There are a lot of comments regarding V1 and V2 on the
following patches:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9160/
- https://review.o
On 06/29/2012 12:54 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Based on discussions during the last team meeting, I had created a BP to
> discuss this in F-3
> (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/remove-v1-related-code),
> though admittedly the work on the OVS + LB plugins in F-2 certainl
I agree with all your points here Dan. Lets not take any sort of upgrade hit
now, given the constraints on the V1 API you point out below. Going forward
post V2, upgrades will need to be taken into account.
On Jun 29, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Based on discussions
Hi Gary,
Based on discussions during the last team meeting, I had created a BP to
discuss this in F-3 (
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/remove-v1-related-code),
though admittedly the work on the OVS + LB plugins in F-2 certainly also
raises the question.
My bias is toward removing
10 matches
Mail list logo
