Re: [Netstack] Quantum Developers launchpad team policy

2012-05-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
Chris Wright wrote: >> Its worth noting that I'm am not aware of any practical benefits or costs >> to being a member of the quantum team on launchpad... > > That was my next question ;) I was not receiving any gerrit watch emails > and someone suggested I needed to be on the team (I don't believ

Re: [Netstack] Quantum Developers launchpad team policy

2012-05-09 Thread Chris Wright
* Dan Wendlandt (d...@nicira.com) wrote: > Its funny, as just yesterday I was asking the same thing to Jay Pipes, as I > find it annoying to get an email and have to click approve all the time > (especially given the up-tick in membership requests). I had assumed all > PTLs had to do this, but bas

Re: [Netstack] Quantum Developers launchpad team policy

2012-05-09 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Turns out flipping the bit was easy, once you know to look for it :) Btw, some of these groups may be used to automatically notify people on certain launchpad events (e.g., https://launchpad.net/~quantum-bugs), but I'm not aware of any notifications for the plane "quantum" group, particularly sinc

Re: [Netstack] Quantum Developers launchpad team policy

2012-05-09 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Its funny, as just yesterday I was asking the same thing to Jay Pipes, as I find it annoying to get an email and have to click approve all the time (especially given the up-tick in membership requests). I had assumed all PTLs had to do this, but based on the list below, I suspect this is more of a

[Netstack] Quantum Developers launchpad team policy

2012-05-09 Thread Chris Wright
Following up from yesterday's meeting on encouraging developers... Launchpad team policy: Nova: Open Swift:Open Glance: Open Keystone: Open Horizon: Open Cinder: Open Quantum: Moderated Any reason for moderating team membership? thanks, -c