> -Original Message-
>> From: netstack-
>> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix.com<http://eu.citrix.com/>@lists.launchpad.net<http://lists.launchpad.net/>
>> [mailto:netstack-<mailto:netstack->
>> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix.com<
011 10:04 AM
> *To:* Ram Durairaj (radurair)
> *Cc:* Troy Toman; Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ram Durairaj (radurair) <
> r
Hi Dan:
Responses embedded.
From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:04 AM
To: Ram Durairaj (radurair)
Cc: Troy Toman; Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation
On Wed, Jul 27
>>> create and ID, return it in the response and then pass it to the plugin with
>>> part of the contract requiring the plugin use that ID? So, the ID is tracked
>>> in the plugin but created in Quantum?
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Of course, one alternati
pad.net/>
>> [mailto:netstack-<mailto:netstack->
>> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix.com<http://eu.citrix.com/>@lists.launchpad.net<http://lists.launchpad.net/>]
>> On Behalf Of
>> Troy Toman
>> Sent: 25 July 2011 18:57
>> To: netstack@lis
is is a good thing, though.
>> > Summarizing, I think that even if this is probably not a high priority
>> task, it is definitely something that we want to address before the Diablo
>> release.
>> >
>> > Any comment?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>>
Toman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:15 AM
> To: Salvatore Orlando
> Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
>
> > Hi Troy,
> >
> > This is a ve
gt;
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: netstack-
> >> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net
> >> [mailto:netstack-
> >> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf
> Of
> >> Tro
dnesday, July 27, 2011 9:15 AM
To: Salvatore Orlando
Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation
On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> This is a very good point in light of the work I'm doing for ma
t;
> Any comment?
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netstack-
>> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net
>> [mailto:netstack-
>> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
>> Troy
Behalf Of
> Troy Toman
> Sent: 25 July 2011 18:57
> To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation
>
> In reviewing the spec for creating ports, it is stated that it should
> asychronously create a port. But, it reviewing the imple
In reviewing the spec for creating ports, it is stated that it should
asychronously create a port. But, it reviewing the implementation and even in
the discussion of what data is returned, this does not seem to be an async
operation. I would prefer to see this mirror the Nova API spec where crea
12 matches
Mail list logo
