Re: [Netstack] Low Hanging Fruit Bugs

2012-06-19 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
Thanks guys, I'll take a look at the link Dan provided and the bug Gary just opened and see if we can help. Kyle On Jun 19, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > I have just opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1015148. I think > that this may be a good way of getting involved

Re: [Netstack] Low Hanging Fruit Bugs

2012-06-19 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, I have just opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1015148. I think that this may be a good way of getting involved. In my opinion it needs to be addressed with Quantum and the Quantum client - which gives a nice introduction. Thanks Gary On 06/19/2012 05:26 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrot

Re: [Netstack] Low Hanging Fruit Bugs

2012-06-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Hi Kyle, Whenever I see a bug that I think is a good match, I try to tag it with low-hanging-fruit. I think I'll update the link on the wiki page to be the following, which limits the query to issues that have been confirmed as real bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.status%3Al

[Netstack] Low Hanging Fruit Bugs

2012-06-19 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
Quantum devs: Is this list of low hanging fruit bugs still accurate: https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit Looks like out of the 7 on this list, 5 have already been committed. Are there any new bugs that could be added to this list for new folks to work on? I hav