t;
> *From:* netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:
> netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of *Dan
> Wendlandt
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:38 PM
> *To:* Robert Kukura
> *Cc:* netstack@lists.launchpad.net
>
> *Sub
From: netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Dan Wendlandt
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:38 PM
To: Robert Kukura
Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Netstack] L3/IPAM summit discussion
e: [Netstack] L3/IPAM summit discussion follow-up...
>
> On 04/24/2012 10:12 AM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback on the L3 (forwarding) proposal during the
> > summit and also prior to that. The action item coming out of t
I think we're having a bit of a terminology clash here, at least according
to what I intended by the definitions posted on the etherpad:
http://etherpad.openstack.org/quantum-folsom . The existing definitions
for "IPAM" and "L3 Forwarding" are below.
I believe that at the end of Sumit's presentat
On 04/24/2012 10:12 AM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your feedback on the L3 (forwarding) proposal during the
> summit and also prior to that. The action item coming out of the summit
> session was to further discuss this with the Melange/IPAM team to
> identify point
Hi All,
Thanks for your feedback on the L3 (forwarding) proposal during the
summit and also prior to that. The action item coming out of the summit
session was to further discuss this with the Melange/IPAM team to
identify points of overlap and/or what are the additional requirements.
Accordingly,
6 matches
Mail list logo
