Re: [Netstack] DHCP Agent

2012-07-08 Thread Dan Wendlandt
I'm personally a fan of the model where a DHCP port is just like any other port, including how the devices are named. Mark's existing patch already sets the device_id attribute on the Quantum port object on the network-id, and uses to look up the port-id, so it should be a pretty easy change to ma

Re: [Netstack] DHCP Agent

2012-07-08 Thread Gary Kotton
On 07/08/2012 10:48 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: At a first glance (meaning that I've not looked in detail at the code), I would say that this kind of situations will be much more likely to happen once we start attaching different services to Quantum ports. I reckon this is an example of incomp

Re: [Netstack] DHCP Agent

2012-07-08 Thread Salvatore Orlando
At a first glance (meaning that I've not looked in detail at the code), I would say that this kind of situations will be much more likely to happen once we start attaching different services to Quantum ports. I reckon this is an example of incompatibility between the dnsmasq-based plugin/driver for

[Netstack] DHCP Agent

2012-07-08 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Great work regarding the agent. My tests with the OVS have passed successfully. I nonetheless have some problems regarding the linuxbridge. The problem is that if a device is created from the network ID then it should have a "gw-" as the prefix. I think that if you create the dnsmasq interf

Re: [Netstack] DHCP agent review and the client lib requirement

2012-07-01 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Mark McClain wrote: > All- > > I've had the same conversation with several you about the DHCP agent and > the use of the client lib. I'd thought I move the discussion over here. > > > The current method It is definitely not my preferred way to solve this > problem

Re: [Netstack] DHCP agent review and the client lib requirement

2012-06-28 Thread Gary Kotton
...@lists.launchpad.net [netstack-bounces+willian.molinari=locaweb.com...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Mark McClain [mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:56 PM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] DHCP agent review and the client lib requirement All- I've ha

Re: [Netstack] DHCP agent review and the client lib requirement

2012-06-27 Thread Willian Molinari
=locaweb.com...@lists.launchpad.net [netstack-bounces+willian.molinari=locaweb.com...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Mark McClain [mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:56 PM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] DHCP agent review and the client lib

[Netstack] DHCP agent review and the client lib requirement

2012-06-27 Thread Mark McClain
All- I've had the same conversation with several you about the DHCP agent and the use of the client lib. I'd thought I move the discussion over here. The current method It is definitely not my preferred way to solve this problem long term. For F3, I want to add RPC support to Quantum. Mes