Re: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification

2011-08-02 Thread Dan Wendlandt
* ** > > Salvatore > > ** ** > > *From:* Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] > *Sent:* 02 August 2011 22:15 > *To:* Salvatore Orlando > *Cc:* netstack@lists.launchpad.net > *Subject:* Re: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification** > ** > >

Re: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification

2011-08-02 Thread Salvatore Orlando
If we are planning to lock down our API v1.0 before Diablo-4, we can just target the API blueprint to D-4. Salvatore From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: 02 August 2011 22:15 To: Salvatore Orlando Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation

Re: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification

2011-08-02 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Great work Salvatore. I'd really like to have v1.0 of the API in Diablo-4, so let's make sure we have a bug or blueprint targeted for that drop. Some thoughts inline below. Dan On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Salvatore Orlando < salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > Hi, > > ** ** > >

Re: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification

2011-08-02 Thread Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)
9:40 AM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification Hi, In order to finalize a "v1.0" for the Quantum API we are currently reviewing its specification and implementation. The reviewed API specification is much closer to the Openstack

[Netstack] Aligning API implementation with specification

2011-08-02 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, In order to finalize a "v1.0" for the Quantum API we are currently reviewing its specification and implementation. The reviewed API specification is much closer to the Openstack API. However, there are a few "corner cases": - Get Attached Resource operation: if no attachment is pl