Re: [Netstack] L3 Forwarding

2012-04-03 Thread Troy Toman
n. > > Thanks, > ~Sumit. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Troy Toman [mailto:troy.to...@rackspace.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:56 AM >> To: Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) >> Cc: Jason Kölker; >> Subject: Re: [Netstack] L3 Forwarding >> &g

Re: [Netstack] L3 Forwarding

2012-04-03 Thread Troy Toman
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Per the information published, Melange is an IPAM service (information > repository for the network). Isn't that fundamentally different in function > from the notion of L3 abstractions/constructs/model required to

Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans

2012-03-21 Thread Troy Toman
We would also like to cover some topics that relate to running Quantum at scale. This would include API rate limiting and caching, understanding the models for scaling out the service and where we should make things more asynchronous (or not) to enable increased throughput. As far as votes for

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Interaction between nova and melange : ip fixed not found

2012-02-29 Thread Troy Toman
On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: 2012/2/29 Jérôme Gallard mailto:jeronimo...@gmail.com>> Hi Jason, Thank you very much for your answer. The problem about the wrong ip address is solved now! Perhaps this octect should be excluded automatically by nova at the network creation t

[Netstack] Melange Essex-3 Milestone release

2012-01-26 Thread Troy Toman
The Melange Essex-3 milestone was released this morning. You can find details at: https://launchpad.net/melange/essex/essex-3 This release focused on bug fixing, splitting out the python-melangeclient and tidying up integration with the Nova Quantum Manager. This was also the first release whe

[Netstack] Etherpad for Quantum API session at Essex summit

2011-10-03 Thread Troy Toman
http://etherpad.openstack.org/QuantumAPI1-1essex This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help

Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation

2011-07-27 Thread Troy Toman
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Troy Toman mailto:troy.to...@rackspace.com>> wrote: On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > Hi Troy, > > This is a very good point in light of the work I'm doing for making sure the > API specification is consistent with its

Re: [Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation

2011-07-27 Thread Troy Toman
t; > Any comment? > > Regards, > Salvatore > > >> -Original Message- >> From: netstack- >> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net >> [mailto:netstack- >> bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of >> Troy

[Netstack] Quantum API question - port creation

2011-07-25 Thread Troy Toman
In reviewing the spec for creating ports, it is stated that it should asychronously create a port. But, it reviewing the implementation and even in the discussion of what data is returned, this does not seem to be an async operation. I would prefer to see this mirror the Nova API spec where crea

Re: [Netstack] "network-refactoring-l2" branch, and Quantum

2011-07-25 Thread Troy Toman
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote: Thank Ryu, very nice explanation, and does fall in line with what I could make from studying the current implementation. I will let Dan also respond in case he has any more insight. Meanwhile, a few comments/questions: (1) Has