On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote:
> Rami,Dan
>
> Seems that this question may be relevant to nova guys. It’s a question of
> design in first place. Is it correct to expose networking operation
> details to the nova-compute or it should be fully encapsulated inside
> nov
Hi Gary,
I'd like to make sure that its easy to have common options across different
plugins (e.g., database options, DHCP options, etc.), so I think this
approach makes sense, at least at a high-leve. I'll take a look at the
review as well.
Dan
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Gary Kotton wr
Thank you Gary.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> thanks to folks who helped with bug triage day, particularly garyk who did
> a bug chunk of work before any of us where awake :)
>
> -- Forwarded message --
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~
> Dan We
thanks to folks who helped with bug triage day, particularly garyk who did
a bug chunk of work before any of us where awake :)
-- Forwarded message --
--
~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~
<>-
Adding main openstack list, as hopefully someone there can common on
implementing Request Extensions using XML.
I personally think that Request Extensions are a cleaner approach, but it
would seem silly to claim support for two serialization types, but expose
some API extension that work only with
I'd like to welcome Gary Kotton and Yong Sheng Gong to the Quantum core
team. Keep up the great work!
Dan
--
~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack
Post to : n
Yong -
The V3 keystone API is proposing taking a different tact from the
"marker+limit" mechanism. Based on the suggestions from the Horizon devs, I'm
proposing for the next API to enable a "page" and "pagesize" query parameter on
all the GET requests, with a default pagesize set to 30 to spec
Hi Robert,
May I add to your question also considerations regarding network creation -
POST operation?
I may be wrong in my understanding, but it seems to me that in case of
RequestExtension it will be possible to create Provider Network via a single
call.
In case of ResourceExtension it will r
+1
On 2012-06-04, at 6:17 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> One more quantum core proposal. Yong has also been doing a lot of great
> review work already, and has been contributing to quantum +
> python-quantumclient as well.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Dan
>
>
> --
> ~~~
> Da
9 matches
Mail list logo
