Re: [Netstack] L3 Forwarding

2012-04-11 Thread andi abes
A few (short) thoughts and questions: * Might be useful to add a use case where a tenant brings their own network service. As Dan points out, a popular case is a load-balancer VM. Another interesting set of cases could be encountered in private cloud environments, where specialized network resourc

Re: [Netstack] L3 Forwarding

2012-04-11 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) < snaik...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Per the context setup by Dan in his email on the topic of Quantum L3 > Forwarding, here is an addition we are making to the earlier proposal - > API/specification pertaining to creating and managi

Re: [Netstack] L3 Forwarding

2012-04-11 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Long email alert #2 :) On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) < snaik...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Troy, All, > > Thanks for this pointer. Yes I agree, there are constructs in here like > the subnet which can be leveraged by a L3 (forwarding) component > implementation. > > So j

Re: [Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread Ken Caruso
On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Tested with Essex release on Precise Beta2 using the OVS plugin. > > Would be great if someone with debian packaging experience could take a look > at this, as things currently seem pretty busted, though perhaps I'm doing > something wrong

Re: [Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
Bug and patch reported. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quantum/+bug/979159 Separated agents and the init (startup) scripts bugs are remaining. I'll open a separate bug for them. Ghe Rivero On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:27 AM, G

Re: [Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Ghe Rivero wrote: > Hi, > just a small comment > the packages should "recommend" mysql and python-mysqldb, but since the > default quantumn option is to use sqlite, they are not really necessary to > make it work out of the box. Anyway, it's not possible to addres

Re: [Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
Hi, just a small comment the packages should "recommend" mysql and python-mysqldb, but since the default quantumn option is to use sqlite, they are not really necessary to make it work out of the box. Anyway, it's not possible to address every environment just by installing the default packages...

Re: [Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread David Medberry
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 00:28 -0700, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Tested with Essex release on Precise Beta2 using the OVS plugin. > > > Would be great if someone with debian packaging experience could take > a look at this, as things currently seem pretty busted, though perhaps > I'm doing something w

Re: [Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
Hi, i'll take a deep look at them later today. Ghe Rivero On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Tested with Essex release on Precise Beta2 using the OVS plugin. > > Would be great if someone with debian packaging experience could take a > look at this, as things currently s

[Netstack] issues with quantum packaging on Ubuntu

2012-04-11 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Tested with Essex release on Precise Beta2 using the OVS plugin. Would be great if someone with debian packaging experience could take a look at this, as things currently seem pretty busted, though perhaps I'm doing something wrong. Dan root@ubuntu1:/etc/quantum/plugins/openvswitch# dpkg -l | g