Hi Jason,
Per the information published, Melange is an IPAM service (information
repository for the network). Isn't that fundamentally different in function
from the notion of L3 abstractions/constructs/model required to drive
routing/forwarding? Reading the specification document referenced in
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Salvatore actually had a branch to merge plugins.ini with quantum.conf a
> while back, but we kept delaying because we felt that we were too close to
> a milestone release.
> Here's the change-set: https://review.openstack.org/#change
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Deepak Garg wrote:
> I will replace this as part of the work of the bp.
> Please confirm.
>
this sounds good to me, but others are welcome to chime in.
dan
>
> Deepak
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8
I will replace this as part of the work of the bp.
Please confirm.
Deepak
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Deepak Garg
> wrote:
>>
>> Oh,
>>
>> I think we should replace it with the --endpoint_url (unless it has
>> some other uses) :
>>
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 20:59 -0700, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote:
> Following is a summary of the additions:
> As you might have gleaned, the proposal until this point catered more to
> the tenant/user aspects of the L3 discussion, however it did not address
> the service-provider/operator aspec
Hi All,
Per the context setup by Dan in his email on the topic of Quantum L3
Forwarding, here is an addition we are making to the earlier proposal -
API/specification pertaining to creating and managing "targets". I have
updated the API specification with this addition and posted the new
version o
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Deepak Garg wrote:
> Oh,
>
> I think we should replace it with the --endpoint_url (unless it has
> some other uses) :
> a. it will be difficult to pass urls like:http://10.102.125.75:
> /v2.0/
> b. to align with other projects
>
Yup, I agree. Symmetry is g
Oh,
I think we should replace it with the --endpoint_url (unless it has
some other uses) :
a. it will be difficult to pass urls like:http://10.102.125.75:/v2.0/
b. to align with other projects
Deepak
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:25
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Deepak Garg wrote:
> Answers in-line
>
> > 1) --endpoint_url: don't we have already a mechanism for specifying the
> quantum service uri?
> [DG] Nopes, :)
>
my guess is that Salvatore is referring to the ability to tell the CLI
client about a host + port (or "poort
Answers in-line
> 1) --endpoint_url: don't we have already a mechanism for specifying the
> quantum service uri?
[DG] Nopes, :)
> 2) 401 error: I think it should include the case of invalid credentials too,
> leaving the 403 error for the authorization work.
[DG] OK, I will update the bp with a
Thanks for the thoughts Ryota, I have responded inline.
Dan
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Ryota MIBU wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have some ideas about vif-plugging and Security Group.
> I added a sub topic to vif-plugging.
>
> ** vif port parameter handling (or portprofile)
> VIF Driver should
Hi folks,
tl;dr: to have effective discussions at the Folsom summit, we need to agree
on terminology more concrete than just talking about "L3", which means
something different to different people. Some proposed definitions are
below.
-
Very cool Arvind! Great to have you back contributing to Quantum :)
Hopefully you'll be at the summit, as Quantum/Horizon integration will be a
key topic there. It would be great to be able to demo the current state of
things during that session.
Dan
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Arvind So
Arvind, that's great!
Though Quantum support was officially removed from Horizon for Essex timeframe,
that won't prevent us from adding support for Essex as a separate package
thanks to a lot of great work done by Gabriel Hurley to make the framework
pluggable.
If you're planning on being at t
Hi folks,
I know many of you have shifted focus to Folsom and the design summit, but
I wanted to remind people that we have yet to release Essex, and there's
still some work to do on that front.
1) Reviews
We're trying to get RC2 out the door today, so we need quick reviews on the
following thre
15 matches
Mail list logo
