Re: [Netstack] splitting quantum client into separate client repo?

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Thanks Monty, I started reviews on these patches as well. Also, I wasn't able to run tox, as I keep getting a timeout when it is trying to download the lxml==2.3 package (other packages seem to download fine). Perhaps it is just a temporary thing, I will try again in a bit. Dan On Wed, Jan 18

Re: [Netstack] quantum bug squashing day (Feb 2nd)

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Deepak, Kyle, great to hear that you will both be participating remotely. We'll see how useful G+ is, but at the very least it will help people match some faces to names. For any presentations, we can also put together a webex (or go-to-meeting, ahem...) which will help remove people participate

Re: [Netstack] Ryu support in Quantum

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > Thank you for review. > > Okay, the approach (distinct plugins + OVS-related library) sounds > quite reasonable. > So let's delay it to E-4 (or F). And I'll give the refactoring a try. Great. > > BTW, I need a small twist to nova/network.

Re: [Netstack] quantum bug squashing day (Feb 2nd)

2012-01-19 Thread kmestery
+1 for the Google Hangout idea for those of us who are remote! Kyle On Jan 19, 2012, at 6:05 AM, Deepak Garg wrote: > > HI Dan, > > Regarding the remote meetups, G+ hangout is fine for me but if it compromises > the meeting > quality in any way, you may consider the in-person meetup and creat

Re: [Netstack] quantum bug squashing day (Feb 2nd)

2012-01-19 Thread Deepak Garg
HI Dan, Regarding the remote meetups, G+ hangout is fine for me but if it compromises the meeting quality in any way, you may consider the in-person meetup and create a video for the presentation/discussion. I am playing with and learning Quantum as of now and have tried Tempest a little following

Re: [Netstack] Ryu support in Quantum

2012-01-19 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Thank you for review. Okay, the approach (distinct plugins + OVS-related library) sounds quite reasonable. So let's delay it to E-4 (or F). And I'll give the refactoring a try. BTW, I need a small twist to nova/network. Is it acceptable for you? I think it's harmless. https://review.openstack.org

[Netstack] quantum bug squashing day (Feb 2nd)

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Hi folks, At the last netstack meeting, I mentioned the openstack bug squashing day: http://wiki.openstack.org/BugSquashingDay/20120202 For Quantum, we actually have our bugs relatively under control (hooray!), so our plan is to focus on code quality metrics like code coverage and pylint. In add

Re: [Netstack] Ryu support in Quantum

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Thanks Isaku. We chatted about this briefly at the netstack meeting on Tuesday. The feeling was that the Ryu controller should probably be its own Quantum plugin, in its own directory in the Quantum source. Even though both plugins use open vswitch, their mode of operation actually seems quite d

[Netstack] quantum code copyright

2012-01-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Hi team, As we write + review code, please remember that it is now 2012, and thus any file that is created or changed in a non-trivial way in 2012 should have its copyright updated to include 2012. Obviously, not doing so isn't a blocker for code acceptance, but it should be viewed as a best prac