Re: [Netstack] splitting quantum client into separate client repo?

2012-01-17 Thread Monty Taylor
On 01/18/2012 06:12 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Thanks Monty! Inline > > Dan > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > > Hey guys - > > Quick status update from me here: > > First of all, Jim's patch is win: > > https://review

Re: [Netstack] splitting quantum client into separate client repo?

2012-01-17 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Thanks Monty! Inline Dan On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey guys - > > Quick status update from me here: > > First of all, Jim's patch is win: > > https://review.openstack.org/#change,3072 yup, this one is in. > > > I've got a python-quantumclient repo made and push

Re: [Netstack] Specification for filters in quantum api

2012-01-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Aaaron's comments on the gerrit review have been addressed. You can find the latest changeset here: https://review.openstack.org/#change,2968,patchset=3 Salvatore From: Salvatore Orlando Sent: 09 January 2012 17:59 To: Salvatore Orlando; Dan Wendlandt Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: RE

Re: [Netstack] error codes in quantum api

2012-01-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Code is now available for review at: https://review.openstack.org/#change,3101 Salvatore From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: 12 January 2012 16:53 To: Salvatore Orlando Cc: Aaron Lee; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: error codes in quantum api Great spec Salvatore. No co