From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:42:33 -0700
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:46:55 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:
>
> > Yes, indeed. Nothing named CONFIG_* should be defined explicitly
> > by the source files, only through Kconfig.
> >
> > I would rather address that
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:46:55 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:
> Yes, indeed. Nothing named CONFIG_* should be defined explicitly
> by the source files, only through Kconfig.
>
> I would rather address that than apply this patch.
by adding a Kconfig option or not? This patch adds one.
From: Ra
