Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-06 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Nikolay Borisov writes: > On 06/03/2016 11:41 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Nikolay Borisov writes: >> >>> On 06/02/2016 07:58 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Nikolay please see my question for you at the end. >> [snip] All of that said there is definitely a practical question th

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-05 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 06/03/2016 11:41 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Nikolay Borisov writes: > >> On 06/02/2016 07:58 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> >>> Nikolay please see my question for you at the end. > [snip] >>> All of that said there is definitely a practical question that needs to >>> be asked. Nikola

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-03 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Nikolay Borisov writes: > On 06/02/2016 07:58 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Nikolay please see my question for you at the end. [snip] >> All of that said there is definitely a practical question that needs to >> be asked. Nikolay how did you get into this situation? A typical user >> nam

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-03 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 06/02/2016 07:58 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Nikolay please see my question for you at the end. > > Jan Kara writes: > >> On Wed 01-06-16 11:00:06, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> Cc'd the containers list. >>> >>> Nikolay Borisov wri

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-02 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Nikolay please see my question for you at the end. Jan Kara writes: > On Wed 01-06-16 11:00:06, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Cc'd the containers list. >> >> Nikolay Borisov writes: >> >> > Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-02 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Nikolay Borisov writes: > On 06/01/2016 07:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Cc'd the containers list. >> >> >> Nikolay Borisov writes: >> >>> Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the >>> user_struct struct

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-02 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 01-06-16 11:00:06, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Cc'd the containers list. > > Nikolay Borisov writes: > > > Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the > > user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple > > user

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-01 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 06/01/2016 07:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Cc'd the containers list. > > > Nikolay Borisov writes: > >> Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the >> user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple >> u

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-01 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Cc'd the containers list. Nikolay Borisov writes: > Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the > user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple > users in unprivileged containers map to the same underlying > real user (e.g. user_st

[RFC PATCH 0/4] Make inotify instance/watches be accounted per userns

2016-06-01 Thread Nikolay Borisov
Currently the inotify instances/watches are being accounted in the user_struct structure. This means that in setups where multiple users in unprivileged containers map to the same underlying real user (e.g. user_struct) the inotify limits are going to be shared as well which can lead to

watches

2015-10-08 Thread Tom
Dear Sir or Madam How are you doing? Attached pls kindly find some of our new design. Looking forward to work with you at an ealry date! Best whishes TomN�Р骒r��yb�X�肚�v�^�)藓{.n�+�阀z�^�)��骅w*jg�报�茛j/�赇z罐���2���ㄨ��&�)摺�a囤���G���h��j:+v���w��佶

jewelry and watches

2015-06-10 Thread Tonny
Dear Sir/Madam: Attached pls kindly find our new design . Best regards! Tonny