Hi Andy,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 01:01:23PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Tycho Andersen
> wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:13:51AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Tycho Andersen
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi A
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Tycho Andersen
wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:13:51AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Tycho Andersen
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Andy,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:13:51AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Tycho Andersen
> wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not sure I entirely like this solution...
> >
> > Ok. Since we a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Tycho Andersen
wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I entirely like this solution...
>
> Ok. Since we also aren't going to do all the eBPF stuff now, how about
> something that looks like this:
>
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I entirely like this solution...
Ok. Since we also aren't going to do all the eBPF stuff now, how about
something that looks like this:
struct seccomp_layer {
unsigned int size;
unsigned int type; /* S
On Sep 11, 2015 10:28 AM, "Tycho Andersen" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:00:22AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andy Lutomirski
> > wrote:
> > > On Sep 10, 2015 5:22 PM, "Tycho Andersen"
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Here is v2 of
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:00:22AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Sep 10, 2015 5:22 PM, "Tycho Andersen"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Here is v2 of the seccomp filter c/r set. The patch notes have individual
> >> changes f
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2015 5:22 PM, "Tycho Andersen"
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is v2 of the seccomp filter c/r set. The patch notes have individual
>> changes from the last series, but there are two points not noted:
>>
>> * The series still
On Sep 10, 2015 5:22 PM, "Tycho Andersen" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here is v2 of the seccomp filter c/r set. The patch notes have individual
> changes from the last series, but there are two points not noted:
>
> * The series still does not allow us to correctly restore state for programs
> that w
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:20:57PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is v2 of the seccomp filter c/r set. The patch notes have individual
> changes from the last series, but there are two points not noted:
>
> * The series still does not allow us to correctly restore state for progr
Hi all,
Here is v2 of the seccomp filter c/r set. The patch notes have individual
changes from the last series, but there are two points not noted:
* The series still does not allow us to correctly restore state for programs
that will use SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC in the future. Given that we w
11 matches
Mail list logo
