On 4/12/07, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
> I think we discussed this issue before.
>
> The current checksum function doesn't consider the kind of packet
> which is padded to reach a specific minimum length. I believe that's
> the problem caused my test case failed
Aubrey Li wrote:
I think we discussed this issue before.
The current checksum function doesn't consider the kind of packet
which is padded to reach a specific minimum length. I believe that's
the problem caused my test case failed. Is this issue fixed? Or is it
acceptable if I make a patch not c
I think we discussed this issue before.
The current checksum function doesn't consider the kind of packet
which is padded to reach a specific minimum length. I believe that's
the problem caused my test case failed. Is this issue fixed? Or is it
acceptable if I make a patch not calculating this ki
