Re: uapi: MAX_ADDR_LEN vs. numeric 32

2017-08-04 Thread Mikko Rapeli
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:25:19AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:33:25AM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > > I find using MAX_ADDR_LEN better than numeric 32, though I doubt this will > > change any time soon. Would you mind if I change packet_diag.h and > > if_link.h

Re: uapi: MAX_ADDR_LEN vs. numeric 32

2017-08-04 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:33:25AM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > First, thanks Dmitry for fixing several uapi compilation problems in > user space. I got a bit demotivated That's quite understandable. > about the slow review progress, e.g. > no feedback what so ever, on some of the patches, b

uapi: MAX_ADDR_LEN vs. numeric 32

2017-08-04 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Hi, First, thanks Dmitry for fixing several uapi compilation problems in user space. I got a bit demotivated about the slow review progress, e.g. no feedback what so ever, on some of the patches, but lets try again... I rebased my tree now and saw commit 745cb7f8a5de0805cade3de3991b7a95317c7c73