On 2019/1/7 下午10:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:54:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/1/7 下午1:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:26:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/1/5 上午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:25:14
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:54:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/1/7 下午1:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:26:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2019/1/5 上午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:25:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
On 2019/1/7 下午1:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:26:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/1/5 上午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:25:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/31 上午2:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:55:5
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:26:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/1/5 上午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:25:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018/12/31 上午2:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
On 2019/1/5 上午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:25:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/31 上午2:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/26 下午11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:0
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:25:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2018/12/31 上午2:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018/12/26 下午11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:03:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/31 上午2:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/26 下午11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:03:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/26 上午12:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hi!
I was just wondering:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:55:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2018/12/26 下午11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:03:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018/12/26 上午12:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > I was just wondering: packed ring batches thin
On 2018/12/26 下午11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:03:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018/12/26 上午12:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hi!
I was just wondering: packed ring batches things naturally.
E.g.
user_access_begin
check descriptor valid
smp_rmb
copy descriptor
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:03:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2018/12/26 上午12:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I was just wondering: packed ring batches things naturally.
> > E.g.
> >
> > user_access_begin
> > check descriptor valid
> > smp_rmb
> > copy descriptor
> > user_access_en
On 2018/12/26 上午12:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hi!
I was just wondering: packed ring batches things naturally.
E.g.
user_access_begin
check descriptor valid
smp_rmb
copy descriptor
user_access_end
But without speculation on the descriptor (which may only work for
in-order or even a viola
Hi!
I was just wondering: packed ring batches things naturally.
E.g.
user_access_begin
check descriptor valid
smp_rmb
copy descriptor
user_access_end
So packed layout should show the gain with this approach.
That could be motivation enough to finally enable vhost packed ring
support.
Thoughts?
12 matches
Mail list logo