> On May 26, 2015 at 1:10 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:35 PM, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com
> wrote:
> >
> > I was also surprised to see that, although we are using a prio qdisc on the
> > bond, the physical interface is showing pfifo_fast.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > So why the
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:35 PM, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com
wrote:
>
> I was also surprised to see that, although we are using a prio qdisc on the
> bond, the physical interface is showing pfifo_fast.
>
[...]
>
> So why the difference and why the pfifo_fast qdiscs on the physical
> interfaces
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 03:41 -0400, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
>
> Hi, Eric. All the traffic flowing through a single class is because
> of the testing we are doing. It all falls into the bulk class and we
> are not generating any other traffic. The remote side utilizes some
> of the
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 01:35 -0400, jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
> Hello, all. I'm troubleshooting why tunneled performance is degrade on one of
> our Internet connections. Eric Dumazet was very helpful in some earlier
> issues.
> We replace SFQ with fq_codel as the leaf qdisc on our HFSC
Hello, all. I'm troubleshooting why tunneled performance is degrade on one of
our Internet connections. Eric Dumazet was very helpful in some earlier issues.
We replace SFQ with fq_codel as the leaf qdisc on our HFSC classes and we no
longer have drops on the ifb interfaces.
However, now, we ar
