Re: spider_net versus sungem_phy

2006-03-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Ok, I found what I was talking about on irc... Andy Fleming wrote a proper PHY layer, initially based on sungem_phy but then evolved into something more versatile including some of the link state machine that is currently still in the MAC driver for sungem. You should probably use that... It's a

Re: spider_net versus sungem_phy

2006-03-06 Thread Arnd Bergmann
Am Monday 06 March 2006 23:07 schrieb Andrew Morton: > Jens Osterkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which kernel version was this in ? 2.6.16-rc5 builds ok for me. > > > > drivers/net/spider_net.c:421: multiple definition of `mii_phy_probe' > > drivers/net/sungem_phy.o(.opd+0x160):drivers/net/sung

Re: spider_net versus sungem_phy

2006-03-06 Thread Andrew Morton
Jens Osterkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Which kernel version was this in ? 2.6.16-rc5 builds ok for me. > > drivers/net/spider_net.c:421: multiple definition of `mii_phy_probe' > drivers/net/sungem_phy.o(.opd+0x160):drivers/net/sungem_phy.c:95: first > defined here - It was 2.6.16-rc5-m

spider_net versus sungem_phy

2006-03-06 Thread Jens Osterkamp
Which kernel version was this in ? 2.6.16-rc5 builds ok for me. drivers/net/spider_net.c:421: multiple definition of `mii_phy_probe' drivers/net/sungem_phy.o(.opd+0x160):drivers/net/sungem_phy.c:95: first defined here - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the

spider_net versus sungem_phy

2006-03-06 Thread Andrew Morton
drivers/net/spider_net.c:421: multiple definition of `mii_phy_probe' drivers/net/sungem_phy.o(.opd+0x160):drivers/net/sungem_phy.c:95: first defined here - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http:/