Re: slab corruption in 2.6.16rc1-git4

2006-02-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:14:11 -0500 > I've hit it three times now, and every time it seems to have happened > whilst it was under attack from junk icmp, which hopefully narrows > it down a little to a specific set of isic parameters. I've sent the following

Re: slab corruption in 2.6.16rc1-git4

2006-02-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:27:02PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > It takes about 15 minutes of over a gigabit link for me to trigger > on a dual Opteron with 2G of mem. Maybe Dave's niagra's would be > faster. > > Although it might be depend on what level of debugging is turned on. > Wha

Re: slab corruption in 2.6.16rc1-git4

2006-02-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:50:44 +1100 Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note the first slab corruption line.. > > > > 000: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b > > > > has a single bit error, which _could_ be bad ram, as this box is an anci

Re: slab corruption in 2.6.16rc1-git4

2006-02-03 Thread Herbert Xu
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note the first slab corruption line.. > > 000: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b > > has a single bit error, which _could_ be bad ram, as this box is an ancient Actually, this is exactly what would've happened if someone did a dst_release on

slab corruption in 2.6.16rc1-git4

2006-02-02 Thread Dave Jones
I've had a box being tortured with random junk packets (created with isic) for a few days, and it spat this out last night.. Feb 1 04:28:09 trogdor kernel: Slab corruption: (Not tainted) start=cefc8a9c, len=244 Feb 1 04:28:09 trogdor kernel: Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071. Feb 1 04:28:09 trogd