On 10/23/2015 12:17 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
If memory is not yet available
when the controller is trying to use the invalid descriptor, the
controller will see it and DMA will stop.
That means leaving RACT=0 and that's what the driver is even doing...
Hm, then I don't underst
Hello.
On 10/21/2015 10:26 AM, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
Thank your for your reply.
Not at all, I'm virtually a maintainer for that driver now, so trying to
filter out the related mails even if I don't have time to read thru all the
netdev mail.
On 10/19/2015 06:01 PM, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
Hi Sergei,
Thank your for your reply.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:48:01 +0900,
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> On 10/19/2015 06:01 PM, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
>
> > I'm not that familiar with this code base so I'm note including any
> > patch yet. I appreciate if someone with insight in this code give a
>
Hello.
On 10/19/2015 06:01 PM, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
In a low memory situation with netdev_alloc_skb() failure,
mdp->rx_skbuff[entry] can be left NULL, however, sh_eth_rx() seems to
access it without checking NULL or not in the following code:
skb = mdp->rx_skbuff[entry]
Hi,
In a low memory situation with netdev_alloc_skb() failure,
mdp->rx_skbuff[entry] can be left NULL, however, sh_eth_rx() seems to
access it without checking NULL or not in the following code:
skb = mdp->rx_skbuff[entry];
mdp->rx_skbuff[entry] = N
