On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
> For things that c
On 4/16/17 8:48 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Excellent. His patches seem to be in. Seems
> commit ce07183282975026716107d36fd3f5f93de76668
> is a good point?
yes. will send later today.
On 17-04-16 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
Johannes or anybody else working on it?
i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
so we can return meaningful messages
example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
taking i
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
I have a patch for
Johannes or anybody else working on it?
i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
so we can return meaningful messages
example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
taking it as a param
For things that call netlink_ack it may be easier if they create
the extac
