On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
>> On 2016-07-26 22:06, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
Hi,
I have a few of BCM5720 and BCM5719 kinds sitting in Dell R320
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
> On 2016-07-26 22:06, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a few of BCM5720 and BCM5719 kinds sitting in Dell R320 and R520
>>> servers - and all of them have certain peculiar
On 2016-07-26 22:06, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a few of BCM5720 and BCM5719 kinds sitting in Dell R320 and R520
>> servers - and all of them have certain peculiarity: they claim to have
>> up to 4 TX and RX rings (and this c
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few of BCM5720 and BCM5719 kinds sitting in Dell R320 and R520
> servers - and all of them have certain peculiarity: they claim to have
> up to 4 TX and RX rings (and this can be set/verified just fine through
> ethtool -l/-
Hi,
I have a few of BCM5720 and BCM5719 kinds sitting in Dell R320 and R520
servers - and all of them have certain peculiarity: they claim to have
up to 4 TX and RX rings (and this can be set/verified just fine through
ethtool -l/-L, with driver defaulting to 4 rings), indirection table
(ethtool -