From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 12:33:30 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Antonio Quartulli
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 22:42:29 +0800
>
>> Do you have any plan on merging net into net-next in the following days ?
>>
>> I am asking because I'd prefer to avoid you the hassle of dealing with the
>> con
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:13:50PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>
> Just FYI I did this last night.
Thanks a lot for letting me know David.
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
From: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 22:42:29 +0800
> Do you have any plan on merging net into net-next in the following days ?
>
> I am asking because I'd prefer to avoid you the hassle of dealing with the
> conflicts.
I'll try to do this in the next few days.
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:18:13AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> Pulled, thanks Antonio.
Thanks a lot David.
We now have some patches for net-next that somewhat depend on the fixes you
have recently pulled.
Do you have any plan on merging net into net-next in the following days ?
I am asking bec
From: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 01:05:59 +0800
> this is another pull request intended for net.
>
> I know that I sent another batch a few days ago, but after having gone
> through my queue I thought that merging these last 4 patches would still
> be worth it (there won't be any o
Hello David,
this is another pull request intended for net.
I know that I sent another batch a few days ago, but after having gone
through my queue I thought that merging these last 4 patches would still
be worth it (there won't be any other pull request for linux-4.6 :)).
The description of the
