From: Johannes Berg
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:37:20 +0100
> Since the new patch would otherwise cause conflicts, it might be good
> to pull net or Linus's next RC containing it into net-next, if you can.
Well, needed or not, it is done now :-)
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg
> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:37:20 +0100
>
> > Here's another fix for something I noticed while reviewing the code
> in
> > a new suggested patch that added another netlink socket destroy
> path.
> >
> > Since the new pa
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:37:20 +0100
> Here's another fix for something I noticed while reviewing the code in
> a new suggested patch that added another netlink socket destroy path.
>
> Since the new patch would otherwise cause conflicts, it might be good
> to pull net or Li
Hi Dave,
Here's another fix for something I noticed while reviewing the code in
a new suggested patch that added another netlink socket destroy path.
Since the new patch would otherwise cause conflicts, it might be good
to pull net or Linus's next RC containing it into net-next, if you can.
Plea
