Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-28

2017-12-28 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 12/28/2017 02:41 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Borkmann > Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 01:18:21 +0100 > >> The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* >> tree. > > Pulled. Thanks! > Any progress on those tests failing on strict alignment architectures? Sorry for

Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-28

2017-12-27 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 01:18:21 +0100 > The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* > tree. Pulled. Any progress on those tests failing on strict alignment architectures?

pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-28

2017-12-27 Thread Daniel Borkmann
Hi David, The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. The main changes are: 1) Fix incorrect state pruning related to recognition of zero initialized stack slots, where stacksafe exploration would mistakenly return a positive pruning verdict too early ignoring