Hi Sangtae,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, SANGTAE HA wrote:
> This is fixed in the current version of tcp_probe by Stephen. Please
> see the below.
> You can copy the current version of tcp_probe to your kernel version
> and it should work.
Many thanks, I'll give this a try,
Gavin
-
To unsubscribe fr
Hi Gavin,
This is fixed in the current version of tcp_probe by Stephen. Please
see the below.
commit 662ad4f8efd3ba2ed710d36003f968b500e6f123
Author: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Jul 11 19:43:52 2007 -0700
[TCP]: tcp probe wraparound handling and other changes
Switch
Gavin McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using linux v2.6.22.6 and tcp_probe with a couple of small
> modifications[1].
>
> Even with moderately large numbers of flows (16 on the one machine) and
> increasingly as I monitor more flows than that, I get strange overflow
> problems such as
Hi.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:26:15AM +, Gavin McCullagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 74.259589763 192.168.2.1 36988 192.168.3.5 5001 0x679c23dc 0x679bc3b4 18 13
> 9114624 78 76 1 0 64
> 74.260590660 192.168.2.1 44261 192.168.3.5 5006 0x573bb3ed 0x573b700d 13 9
> 5254144 155 127 1
Hi,
I'm using linux v2.6.22.6 and tcp_probe with a couple of small
modifications[1].
Even with moderately large numbers of flows (16 on the one machine) and
increasingly as I monitor more flows than that, I get strange overflow
problems such as this one:
74.259589763 192.168.2.1 36988 192.168.3
