Herbert Xu wrote:
> Marco Berizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yesterday I have updated to linux 2.6.19.2
> > (from 2.6.19.1) and passthrough openswan
> > connection aren't working anymore.
> > This is the 'ip -s x s' output:
>
> I presume you mean ip -s x p :)
yes indeed ;-)
> Nasty. This me
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:35:01 +1100
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:07:19PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > Good catch Herbert, patch applied, thanks.
>
> Thanks Dave. I think we need this for 2.6.19 too.
>
> [IPSEC]: Policy list disorder
>
> The recent
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:07:19PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> Good catch Herbert, patch applied, thanks.
Thanks Dave. I think we need this for 2.6.19 too.
[IPSEC]: Policy list disorder
The recent hashing introduced an off-by-one bug in policy list insertion.
Instead of adding after the las
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:59:05 +1100
> [IPSEC]: Policy list disorder
>
> The recent hashing introduced an off-by-one bug in policy list insertion.
> Instead of adding after the last entry with a lesser or equal priority,
> we're adding after the successor of
Marco Berizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday I have updated to linux 2.6.19.2
> (from 2.6.19.1) and passthrough openswan
> connection aren't working anymore.
> This is the 'ip -s x s' output:
I presume you mean ip -s x p :)
> src 10.180.0.0/16 dst 172.16.0.0/23 uid 0
> dir in action allow
Hi.
Yesterday I have updated to linux 2.6.19.2
(from 2.6.19.1) and passthrough openswan
connection aren't working anymore.
This is the 'ip -s x s' output:
src 10.180.0.0/16 dst 172.16.0.0/23 uid 0
dir in action allow index 208 priority 2384 ptype main share any flag
0x
lifetime config:
