From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:54:17 -0500
> On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:34:09 +0100, Florian Westphal said:
>> Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
>>
>> [ CC Pablo ]
>>
>> > Seen this in 2 boots out of two on next-20151207 when IPV6 networking
>> > was available. It was stable when no n
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:34:09 +0100, Florian Westphal said:
> Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
>
> [ CC Pablo ]
>
> > Seen this in 2 boots out of two on next-20151207 when IPV6 networking
> > was available. It was stable when no net was available. Also,
> > next-20161127 is OK.
> > Haven't bisected it yet
Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
[ CC Pablo ]
> Seen this in 2 boots out of two on next-20151207 when IPV6 networking
> was available. It was stable when no net was available. Also, next-20161127
> is OK.
> Haven't bisected it yet - this ring any bells?
Thanks for the report, my fault -- its caused by
Seen this in 2 boots out of two on next-20151207 when IPV6 networking
was available. It was stable when no net was available. Also, next-20161127 is
OK.
Haven't bisected it yet - this ring any bells?
[ 92.231022] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
(null)
[ 92
