Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:04:02 -0500
Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:49:23 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simple. Reading the code of synchronize_net() and
netif_stop_queue() and thinking about why
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:04:02 -0500
Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:49:23 +0200
> > Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Simple. Reading the code of synchronize_net() and
> >> netif_stop_queue() and thinking about why it breaks
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:49:23 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simple. Reading the code of synchronize_net() and
netif_stop_queue() and thinking about why it breaks, instead
of committing bugfixes that only substitute one bug by another. ;)
I'll take a look
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:49:23 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> > >> Michael,
> > >>
> > >> I still have not gotten a network guru to
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:49, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> > >> Michael,
> > >>
> > >> I still have not gotten a network guru to answer any questi
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> I still have not gotten a network guru to answer any questions about
> >> synchronize_net, but I have been testing the patch below
Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:25, Larry Finger wrote:
Michael,
I still have not gotten a network guru to answer any questions about
synchronize_net, but I have been testing the patch below:
I'd say this is racy.
Did you test this on SMP?
No - I don't have the hard
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:25, Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I still have not gotten a network guru to answer any questions about
> synchronize_net, but I have been testing the patch below:
I'd say this is racy.
Did you test this on SMP?
> Index: wireless-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/bc
Michael,
I still have not gotten a network guru to answer any questions about
synchronize_net, but I have been testing the patch below:
Index: wireless-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
===
--- wireless-2.6.orig/driv