Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:09:21 -0500 > David Miller wrote: > > The latter. > > So... what to do about changes which are not bug fixes? Such changes > should not go upstream immediately, because that's the standard rule for > merge windows. > > And queue

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:09 +0100 David Miller wrote: Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are actively working alongside Linus's tree I have moved all current patch applying to net-2.6 instead of net-2.6.25, so the curr

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:38:53 +0100 > David Miller wrote: > > From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:09 +0100 > > > >> David Miller wrote: > >>> Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are > >>> actively working a

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:38:53PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano escreveu: David Miller wrote: From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:09 +0100 David Miller wrote: Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are actively working alongsi

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:38:53PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano escreveu: > David Miller wrote: >> From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:09 +0100 >> >>> David Miller wrote: Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are actively working alongside Linus's tre

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread Daniel Lezcano
David Miller wrote: From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:09 +0100 David Miller wrote: Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are actively working alongside Linus's tree I have moved all current patch applying to net-2.6 instead of net-2.6.25, so the curr

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:09 +0100 > David Miller wrote: > > Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are > > actively working alongside Linus's tree I have moved > > all current patch applying to net-2.6 instead of net-2.6.25, > > so the current tr

Re: net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-30 Thread Daniel Lezcano
David Miller wrote: Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are actively working alongside Linus's tree I have moved all current patch applying to net-2.6 instead of net-2.6.25, so the current tree to use is: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git This tree is for

net-2.6.25 is no more...

2008-01-29 Thread David Miller
Now that the bulk has been merged over and we are actively working alongside Linus's tree I have moved all current patch applying to net-2.6 instead of net-2.6.25, so the current tree to use is: kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this li