On Monday, May 13, 2019 3:01:33 PM CEST, Serge Semin wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Ahh, I see. Then using lock-less version of the access
methods must fix the
problem. You could try something like this:
Kunihiko Hayash is way ahead of you.
Andre
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Ahh, I see. Then using lock-less version of the access methods must fix the
> > problem. You could try something like this:
>
> Kunihiko Hayash is way ahead of you.
>
>Andrew
I wouldn't say that five hours is "way ahead". B
> Ahh, I see. Then using lock-less version of the access methods must fix the
> problem. You could try something like this:
Kunihiko Hayash is way ahead of you.
Andrew
Hello,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 02:19:17PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> On Monday, May 13, 2019 12:51:05 PM CEST, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:29:42PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Hello Vincente,
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:06:04PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
On Monday, May 13, 2019 12:51:05 PM CEST, Serge Semin wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:29:42PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
Hello Vincente,
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:06:04PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote: ...
Hmm, just figured out, that in the datasheet RXDLY/TXDLY pins
are actually grounded, s
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:29:42PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hello Vincente,
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:06:04PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 11, 2019 4:56:56 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > > On 11.05.2019 16:46, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> > > > On Friday, May 10, 2019
Hello Vincente,
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:06:04PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> On Saturday, May 11, 2019 4:56:56 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > On 11.05.2019 16:46, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > > > On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vic
Hello Heiner and net-folks,
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 04:56:56PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 11.05.2019 16:46, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> > On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> there is a regression on
> Hi Andrew,
> it is configured as in the vanilla kernel:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire.dtsi#n191
> ,that is,
> phy-mode = "rgmii";
> There are also these configuration items:
> tx_delay = <0x28>;
> rx_delay =
On Saturday, May 11, 2019 5:08:19 PM CEST, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote:
Hello,
there is a regression on linux v5.1-9573-gb970afcfcab
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>there is a regression on linux v5.1-9573-gb970afcfcabd with a kernel null
> >>pointer dereference.
> >>The
On Saturday, May 11, 2019 4:56:56 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 11.05.2019 16:46, Vicente Bergas wrote:
On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote: ...
Hello Heiner,
just tried your patch and indeed the NPE is gone. But stil
On 11.05.2019 16:46, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> there is a regression on linux v5.1-9573-gb970afcfcabd with a kernel null
>>> pointer dereference.
>>> The issue is the commit f
On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote:
Hello,
there is a regression on linux v5.1-9573-gb970afcfcabd with a kernel null
pointer dereference.
The issue is the commit f81dadbcf7fd067baf184b63c179fc392bdb226e
net: phy: realtek: A
On Friday, May 10, 2019 10:28:06 PM CEST, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 10.05.2019 17:05, Vicente Bergas wrote:
Hello,
there is a regression on linux v5.1-9573-gb970afcfcabd with a kernel null
pointer dereference.
The issue is the commit f81dadbcf7fd067baf184b63c179fc392bdb226e
net: phy: realtek: A
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> Hello,
> there is a regression on linux v5.1-9573-gb970afcfcabd with a kernel null
> pointer dereference.
> The issue is the commit f81dadbcf7fd067baf184b63c179fc392bdb226e
> net: phy: realtek: Add rtl8211e rx/tx delays config
> whi
16 matches
Mail list logo
