Hi Cong,
Yes, your patches fix the warnings.
Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov
Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 11:00 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 05:41 +0100, Andrey K
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 11:00 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 05:41 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >> Sorry, the warning is still there.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure adding sched_annotate_sleep() does anything, since it's
> >> defi
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 05:41 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> Sorry, the warning is still there.
>>
>> I'm not sure adding sched_annotate_sleep() does anything, since it's
>> defined as (in case CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is not set):
>> # defi
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 05:41 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Sorry, the warning is still there.
>
> I'm not sure adding sched_annotate_sleep() does anything, since it's
> defined as (in case CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is not set):
> # define sched_annotate_sleep() do { } while (0)
Thanks again for
Sorry, the warning is still there.
I'm not sure adding sched_annotate_sleep() does anything, since it's
defined as (in case CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is not set):
# define sched_annotate_sleep() do { } while (0)
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 19:59 +
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 19:59 +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Tested with both patches applied, still seeing the warning.
>
> Thanks!
Arg, sorry, this was at the wrong place.
Thanks for testing !
diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c
index b66c84db0766..2548edff86ff 10
Hi Eric,
Tested with both patches applied, still seeing the warning.
Thanks!
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 19:06 +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> Hi Cong,
>>
>> Tested with your patch, still getting a warning, though it's a little
>> different:
>
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 19:06 +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi Cong,
>
> Tested with your patch, still getting a warning, though it's a little
> different:
>
> [ cut here ]
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3876 at kernel/sched/core.c:7724
> __might_sleep+0x14c/0x1a0 kernel/sched/c
Hi Cong,
Tested with your patch, still getting a warning, though it's a little different:
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3876 at kernel/sched/core.c:7724
__might_sleep+0x14c/0x1a0 kernel/sched/core.c:7719
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at
[] pr
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got the following error report while running the syzkaller fuzzer:
>
> [ cut here ]
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4608 at kernel/sched/core.c:7724
> __might_sleep+0x14c/0x1a0 kernel/sched/core.c:7719
> do not
Hi,
I've got the following error report while running the syzkaller fuzzer:
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4608 at kernel/sched/core.c:7724
__might_sleep+0x14c/0x1a0 kernel/sched/core.c:7719
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at
[] prepare_to_wait+
11 matches
Mail list logo