Hi Greg,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:22:20 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> Looks good to me, thanks for this, I'll keep it around for when the
> merge window happens.
Actually, that patch needs to go into the net tree before Dave asks
Linus to merge it - the net tree is based post v4.12-rc1 and
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:08:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c: In function
> 'rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if':
> drivers/staging/rtl
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:08:58 +1000
> I applied the following merge fix patch for today.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:49:26 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net: fix up for "Fix inconsistent teardown and release of
> private netdev state"
>
> Signed-of
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c: In function
'rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if':
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c:2670:10: error: 'struct
net_device' has no member
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:27:46 -0500 (EST) David Miller
wrote:
>
> I applied the fix that synced the two header files already.
Sorry about that, I missed it in checking your tree over breakfast :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 2/15/17 7:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:06:02 -0800
On 2/15/17 7:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le
perf)
fai
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:06:02 -0800
> On 2/15/17 7:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le
>>> perf)
>>> failed like this:
>>
On 2/15/17 7:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
failed like this:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_a
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> failed like this:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
> bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union
Em Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:23:26PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:50:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> >
> > What I think Ingo meant with dependency at the build system level is to
> > somehow state that if file A gets changed, then tool B must be
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:50:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
>
> What I think Ingo meant with dependency at the build system level is to
> somehow state that if file A gets changed, then tool B must be rebuilt.
>
> Now that samples/bpf and tools/perf/ depend on tools/lib/bpf/
Em Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:19:37AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:42:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, the perf header files are kept separate from the kernel
> > > header files proper and are not automatically copied over :-
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:42:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> > bpf.c: In funct
On 13 February 2017 at 15:31, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 2/13/17 2:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
>> failed like this:
>>
>> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
>> bpf.c: In func
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> failed like this:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
> bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member named
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
>
> #define MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
>
> +/* If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
> + * to the gi
On 2/13/17 2:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
failed like this:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member name
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
failed like this:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member named 'attach_flags'; did
you mean 'map_flags'?
On 10/20/2016 05:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:30:33 -0700 Florian Fainelli
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next buil
Hi Florian,
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:30:33 -0700 Florian Fainelli
wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >
On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>>
>> Caused
On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Pre
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
I used the version of the
23 matches
Mail list logo
