From: Dave Jones
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:39:50 -0400
> Neither the failure or success paths of ping_v6_sendmsg release
> the dst it acquires. This leads to a flood of warnings from
> "net/core/dst.c:288 dst_release" on older kernels that
> don't have 8bf4ada2e21378816b28205427ee6b0e1ca4c5f1 bac
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > @@ -126,8 +126,10 @@ static int ping_v6_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct
> > > msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> > > rt = (struct rt6_info *) dst;
> > >
> > > np = inet6_sk(sk);
> > > -if (!np)
> > > -
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 10:36 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:39:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Neither the failure or success paths of ping_v6_sendmsg release
> > the dst it acquires. This leads to a flood of warnings from
> > "net/core/dst.c:288 dst_release" on older
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:39:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Neither the failure or success paths of ping_v6_sendmsg release
> the dst it acquires. This leads to a flood of warnings from
> "net/core/dst.c:288 dst_release" on older kernels that
> don't have 8bf4ada2e21378816b28205427ee6b0e1ca4c5f1
Neither the failure or success paths of ping_v6_sendmsg release
the dst it acquires. This leads to a flood of warnings from
"net/core/dst.c:288 dst_release" on older kernels that
don't have 8bf4ada2e21378816b28205427ee6b0e1ca4c5f1 backported.
That patch optimistically hoped this had been fixed po
