Denys,
Looks reasonable to check for libxt as well.
Please add a signed-off and append mine as well then send to Stephen.
BTW, I just finished compiling iptables 1.4.0 and _it is_ backward
compatible - you just have to point to the correct
environment variable IPTABLES_LIB_DIR; it seems to work
Hi again :-)
Happy holidays :-)
It seems there is serious break in compatibility, but can be fixed by ugly
way. Maybe just to add patch below, and to search libipt AND libxt (for my
case i just edit and change libipt to libxt, but it can be handled in more
smart way.
After i apply all this - it s
On Mon, 2007-24-12 at 11:31 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Seems latest iproute2(even from GIT) searching for libipt_MARK (for example),
> while it is libxt_MARK.
It seems that iptables broke backward compatibility.
> Even if i correct names it will be still not functional
> "undefined symb
Seems latest iproute2(even from GIT) searching for libipt_MARK (for example),
while it is libxt_MARK.
Even if i correct names it will be still not functional
"undefined symbol: xtables_register_target"
Probably some other issues actual with new version of iptables libraries?
--
Denys Fedoryshc
