>
> From: "Steve Wise"
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:08:44 -0500
>
> > For the maintainers, yes. But it avoids setting up k.o accounts and
> > git repos for each device driver maintainer that has this issue.
>
> I think this is quite a reasonable requirement for submitters wishing
> to make sign
From: "Steve Wise"
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:08:44 -0500
> For the maintainers, yes. But it avoids setting up k.o accounts and
> git repos for each device driver maintainer that has this issue.
I think this is quite a reasonable requirement for submitters wishing
to make significant changes acr
> >> > Let me ask a dumb question: Why cannot one of the maintaners pull
> the
> >> > commit from the other mainainer's git repo directly? IE why have
this
> >> > third trusted/signed git repo that has to be on k.o, from which both
> >> > maintainers pull? If one of you can pull it in via a pat
From: "Steve Wise"
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:47:04 -0500
>> From: Steve Wise
>> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:50:57 -0500
>>
>> > Let me ask a dumb question: Why cannot one of the maintaners pull the
>> > commit from the other mainainer's git repo directly? IE why have this
>> > third trusted/sig
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 08:47:04AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> > From: Steve Wise
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:50:57 -0500
> >
> > > Let me ask a dumb question: Why cannot one of the maintaners pull the
> > > commit from the other mainainer's git repo directly? IE why have this
> > > third trust
> From: Steve Wise
> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:50:57 -0500
>
> > Let me ask a dumb question: Why cannot one of the maintaners pull the
> > commit from the other mainainer's git repo directly? IE why have this
> > third trusted/signed git repo that has to be on k.o, from which both
> > maintaine
From: Steve Wise
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:50:57 -0500
> Let me ask a dumb question: Why cannot one of the maintaners pull the
> commit from the other mainainer's git repo directly? IE why have this
> third trusted/signed git repo that has to be on k.o, from which both
> maintainers pull? If o
On 3/16/2018 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: "Steve Wise"
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:31:24 -0500
This issue has also been dealt-with for Mellanox drivers, I believe. I take
it the solution for them was a k.o. signed repo, that they maintain, where
both linux-rdma and netdev take PRs from
From: "Steve Wise"
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:31:24 -0500
> This issue has also been dealt-with for Mellanox drivers, I believe. I take
> it the solution for them was a k.o. signed repo, that they maintain, where
> both linux-rdma and netdev take PRs from for commits that are needed in both
> rep
Hey Dave,
We've been discussing dependency issues between cxgb4 and the upper layer
drivers including iw_cxgb4 on linux-rdma [1], and I want to broaden this
discussion to include netdev and you, since this involves both linux-rdma
and netdev. (note the SRQ patch submission that triggered this di
10 matches
Mail list logo
