On 05/21/15 14:58, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
My picture of the network stack might be wrong, but if the ethernet
driver queues say 5 packets to the network stack and the fourth is a MRP
packet than a priorization that makes the fourth packet processed first
would be nice.
>
If there is
Hello,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:36:28AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 05/21/15 03:07, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:30:40PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >>
> >>>There is very little to do on ingress side since
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 09:07 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:30:40PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > > There is very little to do on ingress side since there is no queue at all,
> > > not to mention priority, you
On 05/21/15 03:07, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:30:40PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
There is very little to do on ingress side since there is no queue at all,
not to mention priority, you could try ifb to see if it fits y
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:30:40PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> > There is very little to do on ingress side since there is no queue at all,
> > not to mention priority, you could try ifb to see if it fits your need.
>
> Note that if the nee
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 18:59 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > Listen Cong, could you please stop assuming that I am a jerk ?
>
> It is at least the second time to tell you: you SHOULD direct my email
> to /dev/null, SERIOUSLY, I have no interes
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Listen Cong, could you please stop assuming that I am a jerk ?
It is at least the second time to tell you: you SHOULD direct my email
to /dev/null, SERIOUSLY, I have no interest to argue any stupid thing
like this with you, PERIOD.
Since y
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 18:47 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> >> There is very little to do on ingress side since there is no queue at all,
> >> not to mention priority, you could try ifb to
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> There is very little to do on ingress side since there is no queue at all,
>> not to mention priority, you could try ifb to see if it fits your need.
>
> Note that if the need is to poli
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> There is very little to do on ingress side since there is no queue at all,
> not to mention priority, you could try ifb to see if it fits your need.
Note that if the need is to police traffic, ifb is not really needed :
TC="tc"
DEV="dev eth0"
(Cc'ing Jamal)
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is the/a right list to ask this question. If not, I'd be
> happy to learn the right alternative.
>
> For a system that implements the Media Redundancy Protocol (MRP,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Med
11 matches
Mail list logo
