Andrew> Sure. Although I am a little surprised to be be receiving
Andrew> them while Roland is in
Andrew> taking-time-off-but-not-really-doing-so mode.
Michael> Well, I don't know what's up either, but Roland acked
Michael> patches explicitly so I figured that's what he wants,
Quoting r. Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sure. Although I am a little surprised to be be receiving them while
> Roland is in taking-time-off-but-not-really-doing-so mode.
Well, I don't know what's up either, but Roland acked patches explicitly
so I figured that's what he wants, too.
--
M
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:19:02 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting r. Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Yes, -mm seems like a good way to get more review.
>
> Andrew, am I using the right format to send things upstream to you?
> There's really a set of independ
Quoting r. Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, -mm seems like a good way to get more review.
Andrew, am I using the right format to send things upstream to you?
There's really a set of independent patches, so it didn't make sense
to me to batch them up in a series. OK?
Maybe the additio
