* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:17:33 +0100
> Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:12 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > > > No, not this. Anyway the last patch Thomas forwarded does fix the
> > > > problem.
> > >
> > > Whic
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:17:33 +0100
Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:12 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > > No, not this. Anyway the last patch Thomas forwarded does fix the
> > > problem.
> >
> > Which one would that be? I might try it for comparison.
>
> Find
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:12 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > No, not this. Anyway the last patch Thomas forwarded does fix the
> > problem.
>
> Which one would that be? I might try it for comparison.
Find the combined patch of all fixlets on top of -mm3 below.
tglx
Index: linux-2.6.20/k
Am 06.02.2007 20:28 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:48:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Could you try the patch below? The RCU serialization code (a rare call
>> but can be common in some types of setups) has a nasty implicit
>> dependency on the HZ tick - which until now wa
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:48:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Mattia,
>
> * Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I have it halfways reproducible now and I'm working to find the root
> > > cause. Thanks for providing the info.
> >
> > Great, I'm obviously available to test any p
Mattia,
* Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have it halfways reproducible now and I'm working to find the root
> > cause. Thanks for providing the info.
>
> Great, I'm obviously available to test any patch :)
Could you try the patch below? The RCU serialization code (a rare call
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:27:14PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 20:18 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > May I ask you for another test ? Please turn on high resolution timers
> > > and check, if the same strange behaviour is happening.
> >
> > Yep, here we go again. Still
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 20:18 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > May I ask you for another test ? Please turn on high resolution timers
> > and check, if the same strange behaviour is happening.
>
> Yep, here we go again. Still seeing long stalls but no negative expires
> offset.
> Actually one more t
Cc-ing netdev and netfilter-devel, the beginning of the thread is here
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/31/306
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:33:22PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Mattia,
...
> May I ask you for another test ? Please turn on high resolution timers
> and check, if the same strange behavio
