Hi,
[snip]
> EIP: 0060:[] Tainted: P VLI
^^^
Just out of curiosity, what's tainting your kernel?
Hmm, no idea actually.
This trace came from a user who submitted a bugreport.
But I had a lot of traces for this bug, so I just selected one
to indicate what the probl
Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
[snip]
> EIP: 0060:[] Tainted: P VLI
^^^
Just out of curiosity, what's tainting your kernel?
-Alex
I code, therefore I am
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protectio
Hi,
> Since I didn't want to loose any tested because of the new field in
> the net_device structure,
> I have used the base_addr field instead and used the following access
functions:
This will horribly fail when you send something to master device
(wmaster0) directly. For example, having ipv
Sorry for the double mail.
Forgot to CC netdev list.
Hi,
> Since I didn't want to loose any tested because of the new field in
> the net_device structure,
> I have used the base_addr field instead and used the following access
functions:
This will horribly fail when you send something to mast
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 14:05:08 +0200, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> Since I didn't want to loose any tested because of the new field in
> the net_device structure,
> I have used the base_addr field instead and used the following access
> functions:
This will horribly fail when you send something to master
Hi,
I have recently updated the 80211 stack located in the rt2x00 CVS tree to
use the latest version of the stack from the dscape#devel git tree.
I also added the scanning patch from GertJan that was only available
in the dscape#main tree.
Since I didn't want to loose any tested because of the n
Add /sys/class/ieee80211/phyX/sta/* attributes.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/Makefile |1
net/d80211/ieee80211.c |5 +
net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h | 14 ++
net/d80211/ieee80211_proc.c |3 -
net/d80211/ieee80211_sysfs
