On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:45:16 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:05 +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
>
> > Hello, sorry for the delay but I only managed to try it out today..
> > I've applied the patch and tortured the system as far as I could, and
> > no hang at all :)
> >
> > I
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:05 +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Hello, sorry for the delay but I only managed to try it out today..
> I've applied the patch and tortured the system as far as I could, and
> no hang at all :)
>
> I've read the thread and it apparently replaces one bad problem for a
>
On 7/12/07, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 19:41 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > >I believe we have a deadlock in d80211.
> >
> > I have it too. But I'm using iwl3945 driver, in-kernel mac80211, and a
> > gentoo kernel (basically a patched vanilla-2.6.22.1). My
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 19:41 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > >I believe we have a deadlock in d80211.
> >
> > I have it too. But I'm using iwl3945 driver, in-kernel mac80211, and a
> > gentoo kernel (basically a patched vanilla-2.6.22.1). My machine is a
> > x86_64 core 2 duo.
> >
> > >The fol
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:17:35AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> Hello,
> First of all I'm fairly new to this list (in all, this is my first
> message), so please be gentle.. I promise I will try not to waste your
> precious time.
>
> >I believe we have a deadlock in d80211.
>
> I have it too.
Hello,
First of all I'm fairly new to this list (in all, this is my first
message), so please be gentle.. I promise I will try not to waste your
precious time.
I believe we have a deadlock in d80211.
I have it too. But I'm using iwl3945 driver, in-kernel mac80211, and a
gentoo kernel (basicall
