Le 01/28/17 à 07:55, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 03:19:04PM CET, ido...@mellanox.com wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:00:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As I am adding support for cls_matchall in the b53/bcm_sf2 drivers, I
>>> was looking into several, yet un
Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 03:19:04PM CET, ido...@mellanox.com wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:00:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As I am adding support for cls_matchall in the b53/bcm_sf2 drivers, I
>> was looking into several, yet unrelated things:
>>
>> - mlxsw does not seem to s
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:00:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I am adding support for cls_matchall in the b53/bcm_sf2 drivers, I
> was looking into several, yet unrelated things:
>
> - mlxsw does not seem to specify whether the port used for capture
> remains usable, or blocks no
Hi,
As I am adding support for cls_matchall in the b53/bcm_sf2 drivers, I
was looking into several, yet unrelated things:
- mlxsw does not seem to specify whether the port used for capture
remains usable, or blocks non-mirror traffic ingressing/egressing it, do
we want a control knob for that? If
