On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:38 -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> FYI, all three patches mentioned as possibly required by the nl80211
> patchset in the header of nl80211.patch are already in wireless-dev:
Oh, nice, I must have missed the merge :)
> I also updated the patchset a bit to apply to current wi
FYI, all three patches mentioned as possibly required by the nl80211
patchset in the header of nl80211.patch are already in wireless-dev:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115625436628696&w=2
(Introduces NLA_NUL_STRING)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115625168405439
Stefan Rompf wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Oktober 2006 13:49 schrieb Johannes Berg:
Yeah, probably makes sense. Though, maybe not just the band but a set of
channels instead?
Yes, this would allow us to keep the definition of a band out of kernel. But
to distinguish between 802.11 b and g, we'd need
Am Montag, 9. Oktober 2006 13:49 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> Yeah, probably makes sense. Though, maybe not just the band but a set of
> channels instead?
Yes, this would allow us to keep the definition of a band out of kernel. But
to distinguish between 802.11 b and g, we'd need a set of channels a
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:22 +0200, Stefan Rompf wrote:
> nice work! Is there any possibility to limit the card to a specific band
> (e.g.
> 802.11 a/b/g) using cfg80211? I'm asking because I haven't seen code to
> accomplish this in cfg80211, but I maybe wrong.
Never really thought about that,
Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2006 16:59 schrieben Sie:
> anyway, it's getting large, so... straight from quilt:
> http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/files/cfg80211/
nice work! Is there any possibility to limit the card to a specific band (e.g.
802.11 a/b/g) using cfg80211? I'm asking because I haven't s
Maybe this time it'll take the announcement too?
---
I have
* addressed Dan's comments about naming a few things and
also fixed the problems he pointed out
* moved wext from net/core/wireless.c to net/wireless/wext-old.c
* added compat hunking for WE to cfg80211, finally completely
separat
Hah, take 6 was eaten by netdev (even the announcement) but it did reach
some people (and before those who did get it wonder: I resent to netdev,
the original mail was accidentally not addressed to netdev, so it's not
that I simply didn't send it).
anyway, it's getting large, so... straight from q
