On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 10:56 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Yes, that is exatly the right way to go forward. The userspace interface
> is however more than just the WE ioctls. It's also that for every wireless
> card one single ethX device appears and not multiple devices with other
> names.
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:49:01AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I've said this like a dozen times but apparently it
> hasn't sunk in yet:
>
> The latest cfg80211/nl80211 code comes with WE compatibility code that
> users can disable if they want to, which, however, gives them the
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 21:55 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Speaking specifically, Linus noted recently d80211 should maintain
> backwards compatibility with the WE userspace ABI, so that existing
> wireless tools keep working, and I definitely agree. For additional
> functionality/flexibility, I
