On 2017-03-13 11:26 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2017-03-13 10:06 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2017-03-13 8:28 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
I've got a bug report for someone using a Intel OPA devices in a
bond, and
it appears these devices have a hardware address length of 20,
opp
On 2017-03-13 10:06 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On 2017-03-13 8:28 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
I've got a bug report for someone using a Intel OPA devices in a
bond, and
it appears these devices have a hardware address length of 20,
opposed to
the typical 6 on ethernet. When they
On 2017-03-13 8:28 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
I've got a bug report for someone using a Intel OPA devices in a bond, and
it appears these devices have a hardware address length of 20, opposed to
the typical 6 on ethernet. When they dump /proc/net/bonding/bondX, it only
prints
Jarod Wilson wrote:
>I've got a bug report for someone using a Intel OPA devices in a bond, and
>it appears these devices have a hardware address length of 20, opposed to
>the typical 6 on ethernet. When they dump /proc/net/bonding/bondX, it only
>prints the first 6 of the address, per %pM and ma
I've got a bug report for someone using a Intel OPA devices in a bond,
and it appears these devices have a hardware address length of 20,
opposed to the typical 6 on ethernet. When they dump
/proc/net/bonding/bondX, it only prints the first 6 of the address, per
%pM and mac_address_string(), wh
